Constitutional Justice in defense of the rights of nature: a comparative analysis of Ecuador and countries in the region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(3)306Keywords:
constitutional justice, Ecuador, environment, environmental protection, rights of nature.Abstract
This article analyzes the development and implementation of constitutional justice in defense of the rights of nature in Latin America, with emphasis on Ecuador and other countries in the region. Faced with increasing environmental degradation and biodiversity loss, this innovative approach recognizes nature as a subject of rights, challenging the traditional anthropocentric view. Through a comprehensive analysis of primary and secondary sources, including constitutions, laws, and jurisprudence, the legal and constitutional framework of various countries, emblematic cases, and implementation challenges are examined. The results reveal that Ecuador leads this paradigm with significant advances, while other countries adopt alternative approaches. Important achievements in environmental protection are identified, but also persistent obstacles in the practical application of these rights. The study concludes that, while the recognition of the rights of nature represents a transcendental legal transformation, its effectiveness requires a holistic approach that integrates public policies, institutional strengthening, and a profound cultural change in the relationship between society and the environment.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Acuerdo de Escazú. (2018). Acuerdo Regional sobre el Acceso a la Información, la Participación Pública y el Acceso a la Justicia en Asuntos Ambientales en América Latina y el Caribe. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43583/1/S1800428_es.pdf
Bedoya Jiménez, J. M. (2020). El río Atrato como sujeto de derechos: un análisis del Caso Colombia. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (74), 116-129. https://doi.org/10.7440/res74.2020.09
Borràs Pentinat, S. (2020). Derechos de la naturaleza y paradigma ambiental: Los retos para su efectividad en Ecuador. Gestión y Ambiente, 23(1), 114-126. https://doi.org/10.24865/GAPP.v23.n1.07
Borràs, S. (2017). Movimientos para la remunicipalización de los servicios públicos: El caso de Barcelona. Revista de Estudios de la Administración Local y Autonómica, (7), 68-87. https://doi.org/10.24965/reala.v0i7.10437
Bustamante Muñoz, N. M. (2021). Derechos de la naturaleza y principio de responsabilidad de Hans Jonas: Hacia una nueva ética ambiental. Revista de Derecho Ambiental, (12), 7-27. https://revistas.uamfiuavic.edu.mx/ojs/index.php/derecho-ambiental/article/view/336
Chible Mendoza, C. D. (2018). Los derechos de la naturaleza en la Constitución ecuatoriana: Una lectura desde la ecología profunda.
Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (2008). https://www.oas.org/juridico/pdfs/mesicic4_ecu_const.pdf
Kauffman, C. M., & Martin, P. L. (2017). Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits Succeed and Others Fail. World Development, 92, 130-142.
Kauffman, C. M., & Martin, P. L. (2018). Constructing Rights of Nature Norms in the United States, Ecuador, and New Zealand. Global Environmental Politics, 18(4), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00481
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Italo Alonso Zambrano Reyna, Yomira Elizabeth Paz Zamora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.