Innovation in educational management and its influence on the quality of the teaching-learning process

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(5)440

Keywords:

Educational innovation, educational management, learning quality, pedagogical practices, teacher professional development.

Abstract

This literature review aims to analyze the influence of innovation in educational management on the quality of the teaching-learning process. Through a systematic review of the literature, various studies that have examined innovative practices in education and their effects on student academic performance, teacher satisfaction, and institutional efficiency were explored. The methodology employed consisted of an exhaustive search for relevant studies in academic databases, using a set of keywords related to educational innovation, educational management, and learning quality. The selected studies were critically analyzed to identify key findings, emerging trends, and knowledge gaps in the field. The results of the review indicate that the implementation of innovative practices in educational management can have a positive impact on the quality of learning, by fostering the development of 21st-century skills, promoting active and personalized learning, and improving teacher satisfaction. However, the adoption of innovations faces a number of challenges, such as resistance to change, lack of resources, and the complexity of educational systems. Based on the findings, a series of recommendations are proposed for future research, such as conducting longitudinal studies, comparing cultural contexts, and exploring the impact of emerging technologies. Likewise, practical implications are suggested for improving educational practice, such as promoting a culture of innovation, designing flexible and personalized curricula, and creating collaborative networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Allen, I. E., y Seaman, J. (2014). Brújula del aprendizaje digital: Informe de inscripción en educación a distancia. Babson Survey Research Group.

Amabile, T. M. (1998). Cómo matar la creatividad. Harvard business review, 76(5), 77-87.

Banks, J. A. (1997). Educación multicultural: Cuestiones y perspectivas. Allyn & Bacon.

Bergman, J., y Sams, A. (2012). Invierte tu aula: Llega a cada estudiante en cada clase todos los días. International Society for Technology in Education.

Black, P., y Wiliam, D. (1998). Dentro de la caja negra: Elevando los estándares a través de la evaluación en el aula. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Reproducción en educación, sociedad y cultura. Sage Publications.

Bruner, J. S. (1960). El proceso de educación. Harvard University Press.

Bryman, A. (1988). Cantidad y calidad en la investigación social. Routledge.

Cuban, L. (1986). Maestros y máquinas: El uso de la tecnología en el aula desde 1920. Teachers College Press.

Darling Hammond, L. (2004). Manteniendo el rumbo: La evidencia sobre la enseñanza y la formación docente. Universidad de Stanford.

Dede, C. (2009). Interfaces inmersivas para el aprendizaje: Implicaciones para la teoría, la investigación y la práctica. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-11.

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., y Nacke, L. (2011). De los elementos de diseño de juegos a la gamificación: Definiendo la gamificación. En Actas de la 15ª conferencia académica internacional mindtrek: Visualizando los medios futuros (pp. 9-15). ACM.

Díaz Barriga, F. (2002). Didáctica y currículo en la sociedad del conocimiento. McGraw-Hill.

Published

2024-09-22

How to Cite

Muñoz Cofre , . L. del C. ., Sánchez Quimis, F. E., Muñoz Beltran , A. A. ., & Martínez Arias, C. Y. . (2024). Innovation in educational management and its influence on the quality of the teaching-learning process. Border Social Journal, 4(5), e45440. https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(5)440

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)