"Teaching Natural Sciences from a STEAM Approach: Impact on Creativity and Critical Thinking"

Authors

  • Yessenia Elizabeth Guailla Muñoz Investigador Independiente, Riobamba-Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3732-2516
  • Erik Danilo Chicaiza Yépez Unidad Educativa Club Árabe Ecuatoriano, Quito-Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6570-4177
  • Danny Mercedes Merino Araujo Unidad Educativa "Juan Henríquez Coello" El Oro -Ecuador
  • Wilfrido Luis Monserrate García Unidad Educativa "Juan Henríquez Coello" El Oro-Ecuador
  • Diana Narcisa Pilligua Sellan Unidad Educativa “19 de Septiembre, Cotopaxi–Ecuador

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(5)468

Keywords:

STEAM, Critical Thinking, Innovation

Abstract

The nature of today's education demands the implementation of methodological changes aimed at fostering active classrooms that promote motivation, participation, and the meaningful acquisition of learning. Faced with this challenge, the STEAM approach emerges as a reliable pathway for sparking, sustaining, and solidifying the desire to know, to know how, and to know how to be. This approach is built around a project that serves as a bridge between the student's individual world and academic content, continuously incorporating active methods, collaborative tasks, the use of multiple intelligences, and work on cutting-edge innovation and technology. Thus, we bring together a series of essential aspects for the proper training of students, so they acquire the necessary competence to face any problem or situation successfully, gaining highly valuable knowledge: critical thinking, problem-solving, logical reasoning, foresight, self-awareness, etc.  In this approach, the focus is on the student, and multiple aspects—academic, personal, social, and procedural—are addressed in an integrated manner. The aim is to avoid the manipulation brought about by a 'banking' education that merely stores knowledge, which we eventually forget, and to achieve true student autonomy. This implies reigniting the passion for knowledge, the sense of wonder, engaging in constructive and autonomous activities, and paying genuine attention to diversity.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Cooke, C.,

Davies, R., Gray, D., & Trowsdale, J. (2017). STEAM: A framework for educational design research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 47(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1125443

Jolly, A. (2014). STEM vs. STEAM: Do the arts belong? Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/stem-vs-steam-do-the-arts-belong/2014/11

Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201

Yakman, G., & Lee, H. (2012). Exploring the effectiveness of STEAM education in Korea. In Proceedings of the KOFAC Conference on Science and Creativity, 14-19.

Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519167

Published

2024-10-11

How to Cite

Guailla Muñoz , Y. E. ., Chicaiza Yépez, E. D. ., Merino Araujo, D. M. ., Monserrate García , W. L. ., & Pilligua Sellan , D. N. . (2024). "Teaching Natural Sciences from a STEAM Approach: Impact on Creativity and Critical Thinking". Border Social Journal, 4(5), e45468. https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(5)468

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.