Distributed Educational Leadership: A Collaborative Approach to Improve School Performance and Pedagogical Innovation

Authors

  • Diana Elizabeth Román Camacho Unidad Educativa Provincia Napo Pastaza, El Oro - Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9825-2766
  • Blanca Marbella Rodríguez Encalada Unidad Educativa Cinco de Octubre, Guayas- Ecuador
  • Daira Yolanda Ramírez Ponce Escuela Guayaquil, Quito Ecuador https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9300-9702
  • Sandra Patricia Chávez Orozco Unidad Educativa Manuel Abad, Pichincha - Quito
  • Margarita del Rocio Asencio Pincay Escuela de Educación División de Infantería, Guayas - Ecuador

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(5)469

Keywords:

Distributed educational leadership, collaboration, school performance, pedagogical innovation

Abstract

The bibliographic review article addresses the existing concatenation between distributed educational leadership, school performance and pedagogical innovation, alternating an imbrication from a direction with a sense of socio-educational co-responsibility. Whereas, when analyzing a significant accumulation of documentary sources and scientific research, it is described how management in the context of basic education represents a crossroads of integral development, being a multifocal process, where the administrative, pedagogical and academic are potentiated from a management, whose fertilization transits through the competencies of a humanizing guide,  where the teacher with a managerial function does not assume a complexion of leadership, but is reconfigured from a shared vision and practice, in a leader who facilitates the consolidation of institutional goals, valued by a complexion of whole, whose cultivation constitutes a multifocal organic system, where school competencies are achieved from the pedagogical construction. The study shows that, from an educational perspective, distributed leadership encourages the active participation of all members of the training community in decision-making and in the search for solutions to the challenges faced by the institution. This promotes an environment of collaboration and commitment, in which diversity of opinions is valued and work is done for the common good. Likewise, this approach managerial, implies a change in the organizational structure, generating the decentralization of power and the distribution of responsibilities. This leads to greater autonomy and empowerment of work teams, which in turn translates into greater efficiency in resource management and in the implementation of strategies aimed at continuous improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Amat, S. (2000). El control de gestión: una perspectiva de dirección. España: Gestión.

Crespo, R. (2016). Claves para una introspección consciente. España: Argea.

Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (2011). Change leader: learning to do what matters most. John Wiley & Sons.

Goleman, D. (2002). Liderazgo que obtiene resultados. NY: Harvard Business Review Press.

Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423-451.

Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: life, career and generational factors in teachers' emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 967-983.

Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(1), 7-35.

Higuita, D. (2012). Interiorización de las manifestaciones culturales en los miembros de la organización. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales [Revista en línea]. Disponible: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/909/90925810003.pdf.

Jordán H. (1999). Apuntes sobre el control de gestión. Material de estudio del Programa DEADE. Cuba. La Habana.

Koontz, H. y Weihrich, H. (2013). Elementos de la administración. Un enfoque internacional y de innovación. México: Mc Graw Hill.

Kotter, J. P. (2012). Acelerar: cómo desarrollar agilidad estratégica en un mundo que se mueve más rápido que nunca. NY: Harvard Business Review Press.

Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.

Lencioni, P. (2002). Las cinco disfunciones de un equipo: un inteligente modelo para formar equipos. España: Ediciones Granica.

Senge, P. (1990). La quinta disciplina: el arte y la práctica de la organización abierta al aprendizaje. México: Doubleday/Currency.

Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.

Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Educational researcher, 30(3), 23-28.

Tannenbaum, R., y Schmidt, W. (1973). Cómo elegir un estilo de liderazgo. España: Mc Graw Hill.

Wheatley, M. (2006). Liderazgo y la nueva ciencia: descubrimientos revolucionarios en una era de complejidad. España: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Published

2024-10-11

How to Cite

Román Camacho , D. E. ., Rodríguez Encalada , . . . B. M. ., Ramírez Ponce , D. Y. ., Chávez Orozco, S. P. ., & Asencio Pincay, M. del R. . (2024). Distributed Educational Leadership: A Collaborative Approach to Improve School Performance and Pedagogical Innovation. Border Social Journal, 4(5), e45469. https://doi.org/10.59814/resofro.2024.4(5)469

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)